16 October 2009
A regular meeting on the issue of monitoring of the Program «Improving business environment — 200 days of reforms» was held at the SCISPM of RT office.
During the meeting the items of the Program were reviewed, in particular Items 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 and 19. More detailed information on implementation of these and other items of the Program was earlier provided in the September' release of the Bulletin and Monitoring list of the Secretariat.
The representatives of SCISPM of RT spoke about the non-compliance with timelines for the implementation of this Program, because there has not been yet the communication system set up between the ministries and agencies, which in turn led to the problems with approval of project documents and receiving respective conclusions on them. There has also been a concern expressed on the matter that many working groups do not understand the wording of the Program's items. Therefore, there was a suggestion made to study all of the items once again, and particularly those that involve assessments to be carried out.
At the end of the meeting, the conclusions were drawn and it was suggested, that the persons had to be appointed under each working group, to be responsible for documents' editing. The participants of the meeting emphasized the need for the continual information exchange between working groups and for active participation of the private sector in this process.
During the meeting the items of the Program were reviewed, in particular Items 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 and 19. More detailed information on implementation of these and other items of the Program was earlier provided in the September' release of the Bulletin and Monitoring list of the Secretariat.
The representatives of SCISPM of RT spoke about the non-compliance with timelines for the implementation of this Program, because there has not been yet the communication system set up between the ministries and agencies, which in turn led to the problems with approval of project documents and receiving respective conclusions on them. There has also been a concern expressed on the matter that many working groups do not understand the wording of the Program's items. Therefore, there was a suggestion made to study all of the items once again, and particularly those that involve assessments to be carried out.
At the end of the meeting, the conclusions were drawn and it was suggested, that the persons had to be appointed under each working group, to be responsible for documents' editing. The participants of the meeting emphasized the need for the continual information exchange between working groups and for active participation of the private sector in this process.
